Central European Papers 2019, 7(1):25-50 | DOI: 10.25142/cep.2019.002

Introductory parts to the constitutions of Visegrad Group countries. Their relevance, constitutional identity and relation towards European Constitutional Identity.

Karol POPŁAWSKI
Kozmiski University

Postponed article seeks to find an answer on legal meaning and role played by introductory parts of the Constitutions of Visegrad Group (Hungary, Czech Republic, Republic of Slovakia and Republic of Poland) countries – both in internal and external (European) aspect. They commonly expresses respect to freedom and human dignity and vast catalogue of principles and values known in European legal discourse. Preambles though are also main source of reconstructing national identity and constitutional identity and thus makes it worth referring to. Regional Constitutional Courts concerned preambles in their judgment several times and scope of their activities as well as methods are worth interpreting. Relation to international principles and values is also not a coincidence, as it is connected with the process of democratic transition in post – communism countries. Hence it refers to notions of constitutional identity and certain level of “openness” of Constitutions of the V4 countries on European law.

Keywords: preambles, introductory parts to the constitution, Visegrad Group countries, national identity, constitutional identity

Vloľeno: 3. duben 2019; Revidováno: 16. září 2019; Přijato: 1. listopad 2019; Zveřejněno: 17. červen 2020  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
POPŁAWSKI K. Introductory parts to the constitutions of Visegrad Group countries. Their relevance, constitutional identity and relation towards European Constitutional Identity. Central European Papers. 2019;7(1):25-50. doi: 10.25142/cep.2019.002.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Court decisions
    2. Constitutional Court of Hungary
    3. Decision of the Constitutional Court of Hungary, 15/2007, of 9 March 2007
    4. Decision of the Constitutional Court of Hungary, 19/2009, of 25 February 2009
    5. Decision of the Constitutional Court of Hungary, 45/2012, of 29 December 2012
    6. Decision of the Constitutional Court of Hungary, 22/2016, of 5 December 2016
    7. Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic
    8. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, Pl. ÚS 66/04: European Arrest Warranty, of 3 May 2005
    9. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, Pl. ÚS 50/04: Sugar quotas, of 8 March 2006
    10. Decision, of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, Pl. ÚS 19/08: Treaty of Lisbon I, of 26 November 2008
    11. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, I. ÚS 557/09: Limitation of Legal Capacity, of 18 August 2009
    12. Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic
    13. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, Ref. File No. I ÚS 8/96, of 30 January 1996
    14. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, Ref. File No. I ÚS 30/99, of 28 June 1999
    15. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, Ref. File No. PL. ÚS 12/01, of 4 December 2007
    16. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, Ref. File No. PL. ÚS 7/2017, of 31 May 2017
    17. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, Ref. File No. PL. ÚS 21/2014, of 30 January 2019
    18. Constitutional Tribunal of the Republic of Poland
    19. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, K 29/00, of 8 May 2002
    20. Decision of the Constitutional Court of Poland, K 18/04, of 11 May 2005
    21. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, K 31/06, of 3 November 2006
    22. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, P 25/06, of 6 February 2007
    23. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, K 37/06, of 8 April 2009
    24. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, Kpt 2/08, of 20 May 2009
    25. Decision of the Constitutional Court of Poland, K 32/09, of 24 November 2010
    26. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, SK 62/08, of 12 April 2011
    27. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, SK 6/10, of 21 September 2011
    28. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, K 28/11, of 20 December 2012
    29. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, K 33/12, of 26 June 2013
    30. Decision of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, Kp 1/17, of 16 March 2017
    31. BAŁABAN, Andrzej: Polskie problemy ustrojowe. Konstytucja, Ľródła prawa, samorz±d terytorialny, prawa człowieka [Polish political system dilemmas. Constitution, sources of law, local government, human rights], Kraków [Cracow] 2003.
    32. BANASZAK, Bogusław: Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz [Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Commentary], Warszawa [Warsaw] 2012, 4.
    33. BANASZAK, Bogusław: Limitation of Sovereignty by the European Integration - The Polish Approach, in: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, Dordrecht 2016, 102. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    34. BARTOLE, Sergio: Comparative Constitutional Law - an Indispensable Tool for the Creation of Transnational Law, in: European Constitutional Law Review, 13, 2017, 4, 601-602. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    35. BISZTYGA, Andrzej: Zmiana Konstytucji jako Ľródła prawa o najwyższej mocy prawnej [Changing the Constitution as the act of highest legal power], in: Zmena Práva, BÁRÁNY, Eduard (ed.), Bratislava 2013, 90.
    36. BORSKI, Maciej: Konstytucja nowych Węgier czy nowa Konstytucja Węgier? Próba analizy [The constitution of a new Hungary or the New Constitution of Hungary? Attempt of an analysis], in: Przegl±d Prawa Publicznego, 2013, 4, 20-21, 36.
    37. CLOOTS, Elke: National Identity, Constitutional Identity, and Sovereignty in the EU, in: Netherland Journal of Legal Philosophy, 45, 2016, 2, 82-84. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    38. DAVIS, Charles Hall: Preamble to Constitution of the League of Nations, in: Virginia Law Register, 5, 1919, 1, 16. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    39. DE CRUZ, Peter: Comparative law in a Changing World, New York 2007.
    40. ERIKSEN, Svein: Institution building in Central and Eastern Europe: Foreign Influences and Domestic Responses, in: Review of Central and East European Law, 32, 2007, 3, 333-334. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    41. FEKETE, Balázs: The National Awoval: More than a Conventional Preamble to a Constitution, in: Challenges and pitfalls in the recent Hungarian constitutional development. Discussing the New Fundamental Law of Hungary, SZENTE, Zoltán - MANDÁK, Fanni - FEJES, Zsuzsanna (eds.), Paris 2015, 11-12.
    42. GARLICKI, Lech: Constitutional Law, in: Introduction to Polish Law, FRANKOWSKI, Stanisław (ed.), Hague 2005, 5-8.
    43. GARLICKI, Lech: Wstęp [Introduction], in: Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz. Tom V [Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Commentary. Vol. V], GARLICKI, Lech (ed.), Warszawa [Warsaw] 2007, 2.
    44. GARLICKI, Lech: Constitutional Court of Poland 1982-2009, in: The political origins of Constitutional Courts. Italy, Germany, France, Poland, Canada, United Kingdom, PASQUINO, Pascquale - BILLI, Francesca (eds.), Rome 2009, 30.
    45. GWIŻDŻ, Andrzej: Wstęp do Konstytucji - zagadnienia prawne [Introduction to the Constitution - legal aspects], in: Charakter i struktura norm Konstytucji [Character and structure of the norms of the Constitution], TRZCIŃSKI, Janusz (ed.), Warszawa [Warsaw] 1997, 169, 173.
    46. HALMAI, Gábor: Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law, in: Review of Central and East European Law, 43, 2018, 1, 41-42. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    47. JOWEL, Jeffrey: The Venice Commission: disseminating democracy through law, in: Public Law, 2001, 675-676.
    48. KAMIŃSKI, Antoni - KAMIŃSKI, Bartłomiej: Inżynieria konstytucyjna w postkomunistycznych przemianach ustrojowych [Constitutional engineering in post communism political chages], in: Ruch prawniczy, ekonomiczny i socjologiczny, 78, 2016, 2, 251. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    49. KAMIŃSKI, Ireneusz Cezary: Karta Praw Podstawowych jako poł±czenie praw i zasadstrukturalna wada czy szansa? [Charter of Fundamental Rights as a combination of laws and principles - structural defect or a chance], in: Karta Praw Podstawowych w europejskim i krajowym porz±dku prawnym [Charter of Fundamental Rights …], WRÓBEL, Andrzej (ed.), Warszawa [Warsaw] 2009, 38.
    50. KELEMEN, Daniel R. - PECH, Laurent: Why autocrats love constitutional identity and constitutional pluralism. Lesson from Hungary and Poland, Leuven 2018.
    51. KELEMEN, Katalin: The New Hungarian Constitution: Legal Critiques from Europe, in: Review of Central and Eastern European Law, 42, 2017, 1, 7-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    52. KINANDER, Morten: Comparing Courts: The Accountability Function of the Constitutional Courts of Poland and Hungary, in: Review of Central and East European Law, 39, 2014, 2, 150, 153. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    53. KLÍMA, Karel: Constitutional Law of the Czech Republic, Plzeň [Pilsen] 2008.
    54. KONCEWICZ, Tomasz Tadeusz - WARYLESKA, Katarzyna: Przemy¶leć Europę i jej prawo dzisiaj, to zadać wła¶ciwe pytania… [Re-thinking Europe and its today's right, is to form a proper questions…], in: Ochrona praw Obywatelek i Obywateli Unii Europejskiej [Protection of rights of the Citizens of the European Union], BARANOWSKA, Grażyna - BODNAR, Adam - GILSZCZYŃSKA-GRABIAS, Aleksandra (eds.), Warszawa [Warsaw] 2015, 97.
    55. KUBAS, Sebastian: Dynamika procesu demokratyzacji Węgier. Próba okre¶lenia zjawiska w teorii [Dynamic of the democratisation process in Hungary. Assignement in theory], in: 25 lat transformacji w krajach Europy ¦rodkowej i Wschodniej, BARAŃSKI, Marek - WI¦NIEWSKI, Jerzy (eds.), Katowice 2014, 89, 92-95.
    56. KUDRNA, Jan: Two Preambles in the Czech Constitutional System, in: Acta Juridica Hungarica, 52, 2011, 1, 22, 24. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    57. LUPO, Nicola: What Hungarian Constitutional Experience Can Teach European Constitutionalism, in: Challenges and pitfalls in the recent Hungarian constitutional development. Discussing the New Fundamental Law of Hungary, SZENTE, Zoltán - MANDÁK, Fanni - FEJES, Zsuzsanna (eds.), Paris 2015, 114-129.
    58. ĄALÍK, Tomáą: Preambula k Ústave SR a jej význam [Preamble to the Constitution and its meaning], in: Ústava Slovenskej republiky 20 rokov v národnom a európskom pohµade, Bratislava 2012, 211-212, 214.
    59. MADEJA, Andrzej: Komparatystyka konstytucyjnoprawna. Antecedencje, ewolucja, przewidywanie kierunku rozwoju [Comparative Constitutional Law. Origins, Evolutions, Possible Development], in: Studia Iuridica Toruniensia, 6, 2010, 134-141. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    60. MA¦NICKI, Jędrzej - STAWECKI, Tomasz: Wykładnia i stosowanie konstytucji w aktach prawnych państw Europy ¦rodkowej i Wschodniej [Interpretation and application of Constitution in legal acts of the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe], in: Wykładnia konstytucji. Inspiracje, teorie, argumenty [Interpretation of the Constitution. Inspirations, theory, arguments], STAWECKI, Tomasz - WINCZOREK, Jan (eds.), Warszawa [Warsaw] 2014, 130-158.
    61. ORGAD, Liav: The preamble in constitutional interpretation, in: International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8, 2010, 4, 716-718, 722-726, 731. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    62. PIECHOWIAK, Marek: Elementy prawnonaturalne w stosowaniu Konstytucji RP [Natural-Law Elements in Application of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland], in: Przegl±d Sejmowy, 94, 2009, 5, 75.
    63. PIOTROWSKI, Ryszard: The Importance of Preamble in Constitutional Court Jurisprudence, in: Acta Juridica Hungarica, 52, 2011, 1, 36. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    64. SADURSKI, Wojciech: European Constitutional Identity?, Florence 2006. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    65. SARNECKI, Paweł: Systematyka konstytucji [Systematics of the Constitution], in: Charakter i struktura norm Konstytucji [Character and structure of the norms of the Constitution], TRZCIŃSKI, Janusz (ed.), Warszawa [Warsaw] 1997, 28, 39.
    66. STRZĘPEK, Kamil Andrzej: Znaczenie prawne wstępu do Konstytucji RP z 1997 r. [Legal meaning of the preamble of the Constitution of Poland of 1997], Warszawa [Warsaw] 2013.
    67. SZMYT, Andrzej: Zakres i tre¶ć Konstytucji RP z 1997 r. [The scope and content of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 1997], in: Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS, 36, 2012, 4, 230.
    68. ©VEJDAROVÁ, Sylva - BORSKÁ, Jana: The refugee crisis and "European values", paper presented on 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Science & Arts, SGEM 2016, Vienna, 6-9 April 2016.
    69. TATHAM, Allan: Central European Constitutional Courts in the Face of EU Membership. The influence on the German model in Hungary and Poland, Leiden 2013. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    70. TRÓCSÁNYI, László: Wokół prac nad Ustaw± Zasadnicz± Węgier. Tożsamo¶ć konstytucyjna a integracja europejska [Among works on the Hungarian Fundamental Law. Constitutional Identity towards European integration], Warszawa [Warsaw] 2017.
    71. VON BOGDANDY, Armin: Common Principles for a Plurality of Orders: A Study on Public Authority in the European Legal Area, in: Jean Monnet Working Papers Series, 2014, 16, 41-42.
    72. WITKOWSKA-CHRZCZONOWICZ, Katarzyna: Wyrok S±du Konstytucyjnego z dnia 26 listopada 2008 r. w sprawie zgodno¶ci z porz±dkiem konstytucyjnym Republiki Czeskiej Traktatu z Lizbony, sygn. Pl. ÚS 19/08 [Judgment of the Constitutional Court on 26 November 2008 on the conformity of the Treaty of Lisbon with Czech constitutional order, sign. Pl. US 19/08], in: Przegl±d Sejmowy, 17, 2009, 2, 272-273.
    73. WÓJTOWICZ, Krzysztof: …¶wiadomi potrzeby współpracy…, Preambuła Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej [...concern of the need of cooperation…, Preamble of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland], Warszawa [Warsaw] 2009, 83-84.
    74. WÓJTOWICZ, Krzysztof: Traktat akcesyjny: wyrok z dnia 11 maja 2005 - K 18/04 [Accesion treaty: Judgment on 11 May 2005 - K 18/04], in: Na straży państwa prawa. Trzydzie¶ci lat orzecznictwa Trybunału Konstytucyjnego [Securing rule of law principle. Thirty years of jurisdiction of Polish Constitutional Tribunal], GARLICKI, Lech - DERLATKA, Marta - WIˇCEK, Marcin (eds.), Warszawa [Warsaw] 2016, 506-507.
    75. WRÓBEL, Andrzej: Karta Praw Podstawowych Unii Europejskie. Komentarz [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Commentary], Warszawa [Warsaw] 2013.

    Tento článek je publikován v reľimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), která umoľňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah